PROCEDURE & WORKFLOW
GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM)
Spectrum Grievance
Benchmarking GRM
GRM Procedure and Workflow
1
2
3
SPECTRUM OF POSITIVE MINE IMPACTS (DIRECT, INDIRECT & INDUCED)
Negative Impact
POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF MINING OPERATIONS BASED ON THE SPECTRUM OF REPORTING SOURCES
GRM –Merger & Acquisition (M&A)
Key Issues:
Key Action:
GRM – Exploration Phase
Key Issues:
Key Action:
GRM –Land Acquisition & Resettlement Phase
Key Issues:
Key Action:
GRM – Construction Phase
Key Issues:
Key Action:
GRM – Operation Phase
Key Issues:
Key Action:
GRM – Post Mine Phase
Key Issues:
Key Action:
Procedures: 8 Key Steps of VALE’s GRM
1
Risk Assessment, Pre-Identification, and Mapping
2
Receive and Record Grievances
3
Assessment and Categorization
4
Reporting and Investigation
5
Develop Resolution and Action Plan
6
Resolution and Communication
7
Monitoring and Follow-Up
8
Evaluating and Learning
Grievance Administrator (GA) at VALE office: to be a reliable point of contact and ensure the grievance resolution process works accordingly
VALE Unit/Department: The department that caused the impact of the grievance, as well as those related to the grievance, including the department that has the authority to resolve the grievance.
Grievance Committee (GC): The Grievance Committee is responsible for making management decisions in relation to grievances. It is responsible for approving action plans designed to resolve grievances and for approving official correspondence to external parties in relation to verified grievances. If VALE verifies that one of its suppliers is in breach of the Policy, the Grievance Committee will refer the findings to the VALE “department/unit in VALE that cooperated with that supplier” and determine appropriate remedial actions which may include the suspension of business relationships with suppliers.
Role and Responsibility
A dedicated staff member (e.g., from Sustainability or Community Relations) who manages the GRM’s day-to-day operations. The GA is the GRM’s “traffic controller,” ensuring
complaints move smoothly through all steps, keeping things organized, transparent, and on track to avoid delays or mistrust.
Key Point: Like a project manager, the GA runs the show daily, ensuring no complaint gets lost.
Grievance Administrator (GA)
Roles and Responsibilities:
Step 1 (Risk Mapping): Helps identify potential grievance risks (e.g., pollution hotspots) and updates risk lists.
Step 2 (Receive and Record): Collects complaints via hotline, portal, or in-person, logs them in the GRM system (e.g., Borealis), and assigns case IDs.
Step 3 (Assessment): Reviews complaints for validity, categorizes them (e.g., Environmental, Labor), and flags urgent ones (e.g., high severity).
Step 4 (Investigation): Coordinates investigations, assigning tasks (e.g., site visits) and ensuring evidence (e.g., test results) is logged.
Step 5 (Resolution Planning): Supports plan drafting, gathering input from teams, and tracks plan progress.
Step 6 (Resolution): Monitors fix implementation (e.g., repairs done) and updates complainants (e.g., via SMS).
Step 7 (Monitoring): Checks if fixes work (e.g., retests), logs feedback, and follows up on gaps.
Grievance Administrator (GA)
Roles and Responsibilities:
A group of senior staff (e.g., managers from Operations, Legal, Sustainability) who oversee the GRM, make big decisions, and ensure fairness. : The GC is the “decision board,”
ensuring resolutions are fair, legal, and effective, preventing costly escalations (e.g., 30% savings, World Bank 2022).
Key Point: Like judges, the GC keeps the GRM accountable and strategic.
Grievance Committee (GC)
Roles and Responsibilities:
Step 1 (Risk Mapping): Approves risk priorities (e.g., high-severity zones), ensuring alignment with Vale’s goals.
Step 2-3 (Receive and Assess): Provides guidance on complex or sensitive complaints (e.g., legal risks), ensuring proper categorization.
Step 4 (Investigation): Reviews investigation findings for high-severity cases (e.g., major pollution), ensuring accuracy.
Step 5 (Resolution Planning): Approves resolution plans, checks budgets (e.g., “Is $100K enough?”), and ensures compliance (e.g., UU Minerba).
Step 6 (Resolution): Oversees major fixes, resolves disputes (e.g., if complainants disagree), and signs off on completion.
Step 7 (Monitoring): Reviews monitoring results, approves follow-up actions (e.g., extra training), and ensures no recurrence.
Step 8 (Evaluating): Analyzes GRM performance, approves system updates (e.g., new risk maps), and reports to leadership.
Grievance Committee (GC)
Roles and Responsibilities:
Teams like Environmental, Community Relations, Operations, Legal, and HR, supporting the GRM as needed. These teams are the “specialists,” bringing expertise to solve specific issues, ensuring the GRM works across Vale’s operations.
Key Point: Like a toolbox, each department adds skills to get the job done.
Other Departments
Roles and Responsibilities:
Environmental Team:
Steps 1, 4, 7: Maps pollution risks, conducts tests (e.g., water quality), monitors fixes (e.g., retests).
Why: Ensures environmental compliance, reduces risks like spills.
Community Relations:
Steps 2, 4, 6, 7: Receives complaints, interviews stakeholders, communicates fixes, gathers feedback.
Why: Builds trust with locals, prevents protests.
Other Departments
Roles and Responsibilities:
Steps 4, 6, 7: Provides data (e.g., equipment logs), implements fixes (e.g., repairs), checks outcomes.
Why: Ensures mining processes align with resolutions.
Legal:
Steps 3, 5, 6: Checks compliance (e.g., Law No. 32/2009), drafts agreements (e.g., compensation), advises on risks.
Why: Keeps Vale lawful, avoids fines.
HR:
Steps 4, 5, 7: Handles labor grievances, trains staff (e.g., GRM modules, April 9 chat), monitors workplace fixes.
Why: Supports workers, improves morale.
Kemp, D., & Bond, C. J. (2015). “Mining and Community Grievances: A Case Study Analysis.” Resources Policy, 45, 256-263.
Supports clear roles (e.g., GA for coordination, GC for oversight) scaling with grievance severity (Low to Critical) in mining GRMs.
Access: ScienceDirect.
World Bank (2014). “Grievance Redress Mechanisms: A Global Review.”
Highlights defined roles (e.g., administrators, committees, specialists) to match grievance urgency, cutting costs by 30%, as noted in Roles doc (p. 4).
Access: World Bank.
Reference
Rees, C., & Vermijs, D. (2011). “Mapping Grievance Mechanisms in the Business and Human Rights Arena.” Harvard Kennedy School, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative.
Details roles like GA for daily tasks and GC for strategic decisions, tied to severity-based prioritization in GRMs.
Access: Harvard.
International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) (2019). “Handling and Resolving Local-level Concerns and Grievances.”
Recommends role clarity (e.g., departments for expertise, GC for approvals) to handle grievances by impact, aligning with Vale’s structure (Roles doc p. 1-3).
Access: ICMM.
Vale Sustainability Report (2023).
Confirms stakeholder engagement teams (e.g., Community Relations) and governance boards (e.g., GC), supporting roles in GRM operations.
Access: Vale.
FLOW OF GRM
Step 1
Grievance level assessment, pre-identification and mapping of potential grievance
Step 2
Receive and recording grievance
Step 3
Assessment and Categorization
Step 4
Reporting and Investigation
Step 5
Develop Resolution, response and action plan
Step 6-7
Resolution/action plan implementation
and communication & Monitoring and follow-up
Step 8
Evaluating and learning